ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Is screw position a greater contributor to adjacent segment disease than plate-to-disc distance following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the risk factors for radiographic adjacent segment disease (RASD), with a focus on the impact of screw position, following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation (ACDF-P).
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive analysis on 126 patients who underwent ACDF-P for degenerative cervical spinal disease, evaluating various factors such as demographics, cervical sagittal parameters, the number of fused segments, sagittal screw angle, plate to disc distance (PDD), and screw position score (SPS). Based on MRI findings, we classified patients into ASD and Non-ASD groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors, and the model's discrimination was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive value of SPS for RASD using ROC curves. To further investigate the relationship between screw position and RASD, we reanalyzed the data of patients with PDD of less than 5 mm to eliminate the effect of PDD.
resultsAmong the 126 patients, 57 developed RASD after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. No significant differences were observed in demographics, cervical sagittal parameters, number of fused segments, or sagittal screw angle between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, PDD and SPS showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). Multivariate binary logistic models revealed that PDD (OR: 3.238; 95% CI:1.191-8.807; p < 0.021) and SPS (OR: 1.309 95% CI: 1.092-1.568; p = 0.004) were risk factor for RASD. The models exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration. The area under the curve (AUC) for RASD identified by SPS were 0.674. Among patients with PDD less than 5 mm, SPS was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the Non-ASD group (p < 0.05). After grouping by screw position, it was determined that both the incidence of RASD (70.5% vs. 34.6%, p < 0.05) and the percentage of long-segment fusion (3-4 levels) (38.6% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in the group with a score greater than 6 compared to the group with a score of 6 or lower.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that a PDD of less than 5 mm and a higher SPS are related with RASD following ACDF-P. Secondary analysis indicates that screw position, as indicated by the SPS, may be a primary contributor to ASD, rather than PDD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.