ArticleBMC nutrition2025
A qualitative study to explore mother's experiences of a family MUAC project in two provinces in South Africa.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn South Africa, severe acute malnutrition remains a significant cause of child mortality. Measuring mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple, cost-effective approach to identify malnutrition in communities. The Family MUAC intervention supported community health workers (CHWs) to mentor mothers and child caregivers to measure MUAC, record their findings and access nutrition information from the child's Road-to-Health-Book. Family MUAC was implemented in seven sites in two provinces in South Africa: Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal. This study aimed to explore mother/caregiver's perceptions and experiences of participating in Family MUAC.
methodsFocus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with mothers purposively selected by CHWs based on their active participation in Family MUAC. Trained qualitative researchers conducted one FGD at each participating site. Coding reliability thematic analysis with topic summaries was employed to analyse the data using Nvivo v12.
resultsSeven FGDs were conducted with a total of 59 participants. Key themes identified were mother's perceptions of the CHW's role, experiences of implementing Family MUAC activities, and perceptions of the broader effect on maternal empowerment and child health. Mothers appreciated the support from CHWs who were perceived as patient and caring, taking time to develop mother's skills and answer questions. CHWs provided ongoing care, encouraged participation and understood the mother's home situation. Mothers experienced group learning positively, and helped each other learn about MUAC measurements. Most mothers experienced measuring MUAC as challenging initially, needing support from CHWs to gain confidence to measure and record findings. Participating in Family MUAC empowered mothers in caring for their child, and improved their relationships with CHWs. Mothers compared support from CHWs to care received at the clinic, saying clinic visits were costly and time-consuming and nurses frequently did not explain their findings. Mothers reported feeling more confident to ask questions during clinic visits after participating in family MUAC.
conclusionsUsing CHWs to support mothers measuring MUAC in households was acceptable and feasible. CHWs provided ongoing good quality care, relevant advice and support, and empowered mothers. Family MUAC had wide ranging benefits for building relationships and peer support in communities and strengthened mothers perceived role in the care of her child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.