ArticleBMC psychology2025
What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaternalistic leadership is usually adopted by the presidents of universities. Presidents are responsible for the success or failure of the university operations. In addition, they are responsible for policy promotion as well. This thinking model significantly differs from the western democratic view and it is worth discussing. The purpose of this study is to understand how paternalistic leadership (PL) affects peer leadership (PLD) and interactions among faculty members in universities.
methodsThe current study was conducted with the participation of faculty members working in universities in Beijing. In this respect, a total of 320 copies of questionnaire were distributed. After removing the invalid and incomplete ones, 283 copies were found as valid. In the end, 88% of the questionnaires were considered valid. Factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. In addition, a structural equation modeling was implemented to test the hypotheses.
findingsThe research results showed that a university leader with balanced benevolence, authoritarianism, and moral leadership can empower a peer leader teacher to exhibit goal oriented behaviors. These behaviors also help the promotion of team harmony. Secondly, a university leader with a paternalistic leadership style can improve PI among professional teachers. Additionally, the leader can make the peer leader establish positive interaction.
conclusionThe results of the study revealed that a leader in the teacher team with higher PLD characteristics can result in better peer interaction (PI) among teachers. Specific recommendations are provided to address the potential challenges university faculty may face in PIs, particularly in areas they perceive as having a poorer experience. It should be kept in mind that the power formed by university teams cannot be ignored to accomplish important tasks at the university and this power promotes the effectiveness of the university.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.