ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2025
Scheduling an appointment for MRI: patient perception of wait time and difficulty.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWait times (WTs) for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are rising in many countries. Long WT delay diagnosis and treatment, and affect patient satisfaction. Little research has examined the patient experience of scheduling and waiting for an MRI. This study aimed to assess difficulty of scheduling an appointment for MRI from patients' perspectives; and to identify factors associated with longer WT and greater difficulty.
methodsAn online survey of patients' experience of scheduling an MRI was conducted in January-February 2023 among a representative sample of 557 Israeli adults. All participants had undergone an MRI in the public health system within the past year.
resultsMedian WT was 1-2 months and did not differ significantly by demographic variables or exam type. 28% considered the WT unreasonable. WTs ≥ 1 month were reported by two thirds of respondents; longer WT were reported for respondents who tried to get an earlier appointment compared to those who did not (p < 0.001). WT for radiology report was significantly related to shift (shorter WT for morning MRI exams, p = 0.045), sex (men reported shorter WT, p = 0.042) and age (over 55s reported shortest WT, p = 0.006). In a stepwise logistic regression modeling the probability of finding the process difficult, significant factors included time between referral and calling to schedule, tried multiple sites, tried to get an earlier appointment, WT for report, and overall reasonableness of WT.
conclusionsMany patients experienced some difficulty scheduling an MRI, particularly when calling multiple sites, since there is no centralized point of contact. HMO agreements can also lengthen the wait. Alongside objective metrics documented by service providers, it is important to consider patients' perspectives in scheduling imaging. While efforts have been made in recent years to tackle MRI WT, adding scanners and personnel, the majority of patients wait at least a month, and the process of scheduling and waiting for an appointment can be challenging. Policy changes, including greater transparency of WTs in different institutions, and a centralized booking center for MRI, could be considered to streamline the appointment process and reduce the challenges patients face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.