Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140934›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

Publishing neural networks in drug discovery might compromise training data privacy.

Fabian P Krüger, Johan Östman, Lewis Mervin, Igor V Tetko, Ola Engkvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian P KrügerDiscovery Sciences, Molecular AI, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, 431 83, Sweden. fabian.krueger@tum.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6420-2175
Johan ÖstmanAI Sweden, Gothenburg, 41756, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4138-0508
Lewis MervinDiscovery Sciences, Molecular AI, AstraZeneca R&D, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-0824
Igor V TetkoMolecular Targets and Therapeutics Center, Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Munich - Deutsches Forschungszentrum Für Gesundheit Und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg, 85764, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-0012
Ola EngkvistDiscovery Sciences, Molecular AI, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, 431 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-6461

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101120466VINNOVA 2023-03000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the risks of exposing confidential chemical structures when machine learning models trained on these structures are made publicly available. We use membership inference attacks, a common method to assess privacy that is largely unexplored in the context of drug discovery, to examine neural networks for molecular property prediction in a black-box setting. Our results reveal significant privacy risks across all evaluated datasets and neural network architectures. Combining multiple attacks increases these risks. Molecules from minority classes, often the most valuable in drug discovery, are particularly vulnerable. We also found that representing molecules as graphs and using message-passing neural networks may mitigate these risks. We provide a framework to assess privacy risks of classification models and molecular representations, available at https://github.com/FabianKruger/molprivacy . Our findings highlight the need for careful consideration when sharing neural networks trained on proprietary chemical structures, informing organisations and researchers about the trade-offs between data confidentiality and model openness.

Indexed as

CheminformaticsDrug discoveryMachine learningMembership inference attackPrivacyQSAR

Identifiers

PMID40140934
PMCPMC11948693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.