ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Predicting rheumatoid arthritis progression from seronegative undifferentiated arthritis using machine learning: a deep learning model trained on the KURAMA cohort and externally validated with the ANSWER cohort.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting the risk of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis using a SHAP-based interpretable machine learning model.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Risk prediction rules in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and validation using the APIPPRA cohort.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Autoantibody and disease control stability following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Identifying AIM2 Circulating Methylation Levels as a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Targeted DNA Methylation Sequencing.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Lactoferrin and Thioredoxin in Rheumatoid Arthritis Are Associated with Fibrinogen but Not with Other Acute Phase Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUndifferentiated arthritis (UA) often develops into rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but predicting disease progression from seronegative UA remains challenging because seronegative RA often does not meet the classification criteria. This study aims to build a machine learning (ML) model to predict the progression from seronegative UA to RA using clinical and laboratory parameters.
methodsKURAMA cohort (training dataset) and ANSWER cohort (validation dataset) were utilized. Patients with seronegative UA were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical and laboratory parameters, including demographic data, acute phase reactants, autoantibodies, and physical examination findings, were collected. Various ML models, including a Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and other metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were computed to interpret the importance of variables.
resultsKURAMA cohort included 210 patients with seronegative UA, of whom 57 (27.1%) progressed to RA. The FNN model demonstrated the highest predictive performance with an AUC of 0.924 and a sensitivity of 80.7% in the training dataset. Validation with ANSWER cohort (140 patients; 32.1% progressed to RA) showed an AUC of 0.777, sensitivity of 77.8%. MMP-3 had the highest impact on the model.
conclusionsThe FNN model exhibited robust performance in predicting the progression of RA from seronegative UA and maintained substantial sensitivity in an independent validation cohort. This model using only clinical and laboratory parameters has potential for predicting RA progression in patients with seronegative UA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.