ArticleBMC biology2025
Pangenome graph mitigates heterozygosity overestimation from mapping bias: a case study in Chinese indigenous pigs.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of two Chinese wild boars (Sus scrofa).Scientific data · 2026Article
- The pangenome: a statistical model, not a fixed biological property.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreeds genetically distant from the reference genome often show considerable differences in DNA fragments, making it difficult to achieve accurate mappings. The genetic differences between pig reference genome (Sscrofa11.1) and Chinese indigenous pigs may lead to mapping bias and affect subsequent analyses.
resultsOur analysis revealed that pangenome exhibited superior mapping accuracy to the Sscrofa11.1, reducing false-positive mappings by 1.4% and erroneous mappings by 0.8%. Furthermore, the pangenome yielded more accurate genotypes of SNP (F1: 0.9660 vs. 0.9607) and INDEL (F1: 0.9226 vs. 0.9222) compared to Sscrofa11.1. In real sequencing data, the inconsistent SNPs called from the pangenome exhibited lower genome heterozygosity compared to those identified by the Sscrofa11.1, including observed heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity. The same reduction of heterozygosity overestimation was also found in the chicken pangenome.
conclusionsThis study quantifies the mapping bias of Sscrofa11.1 in Chinese indigenous pigs, demonstrating that mapping bias can lead to an overestimation of heterozygosity in Chinese indigenous pig breeds. The adoption of a pig pangenome mitigates this bias and provides a more accurate representation of genetic diversity in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.