SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2025
Comparison of the quality of ovarian tissue cryopreservation by conventional slow cryopreservation and vitrification-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
- Technological Advances of Cryopreservation in Ovarian Tissue for Female Children: Exploring the Molecular Insights and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Identification of cryosensitive niches and a targetable FOS/AP‑1 program in the human ovarian cortex by single‑cell and spatial transcriptomics.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation of Ovarian Cortex Tissue.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Protective Effect of Glutathione Supplementation On Mouse Ovarian Tissue Vitrification and Autologous Transplantation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Surgical approaches to fertility preservation in the cancer patient: current and future directions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue - what's known so far and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- The mechanism and protective strategies of follicle injury after ovarian tissue cryopreservation and thawed transplantation: a review.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOvarian tissue cryopreservation is increasingly applied in patients undergoing gonadotoxic radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment or other patients who need to preserve their fertility. However, there is currently limited evidence to know which type of ovarian tissue cryopreservation is better. The advantages and disadvantages of conventional slow cryopreservation and vitrification are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to analyze the ovarian tissue quality of ovarian tissue cryopreservation by conventional slow cryopreservation and vitrification.
methodsAccording to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies to January 2024. Studies comparing the follicular viability of conventional slow cryopreservation versus vitrification were assessed for eligibility. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2).
resultsA total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results of the primary outcomes indicated that there was no difference between the two approaches for follicular viability (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84-1.09, P = 0.520, I
conclusionsConventional slow cryopreservation and vitrification appear to provide comparable outcomes. The heterogeneity of the literature prevents us from comparing these two techniques. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement. This meta-analysis provides limited data which may help clinicians when counselling patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.