Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140863›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Neural modifications of transtibial prosthesis (TTP) users: an event-related potentials study.

Ampika Nanbancha, Weerawat Limroongreungrat, Manunchaya Samala, Jutima Rattanakoch, Gary Guerra, Wisavaporn Niamsang, Kittichai Tharawadeepimuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ampika NanbanchaCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Weerawat LimroongreungratCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Manunchaya SamalaSirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Jutima RattanakochSirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Gary GuerraExercise and Sport Science Department, St. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX, 78228, USA.
Wisavaporn NiamsangSirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Kittichai TharawadeepimukCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. kittichai.tha@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with lower-limb amputations are highly dependent upon prostheses to perform daily activities and adapt to environmental changes. Transtibial prosthesis (TTP) users in particular, experience greater challenges in motor control and demonstrate impaired cognitive functions, when compared to able-bodied persons. The identification of neural mechanisms underlying adaptation or compensation may contribute to the development and expansion of rehabilitation strategies.

objectiveTo examine neuroplasticity changes in transtibial amputees by analyzing event-related potentials (ERPs) obtained from Electroencephalogram (EEG) during Go/No-Go tasks to assess cognitive control and neural adaptations.

methodsTwenty-eight TTP users and twenty-eight able-bodied persons were recruited. EEG was recorded in eyes-open resting states, and ERPs during a Go/No-go task.

resultsOur findings demonstrate that, during the resting-state, the TTP users group exhibited no significant differences in brain activity across regions. However, during Go/No-go task, an increase of N2 amplitude was observed, and significant reduction in the amplitude of P3 amplitude was noted when compared to able-bodied group.

conclusionThese findings demonstrated neural modifications by individuals with transtibial amputation, particularly in relation to inhibitory control, which is essential for effective attentional control. Deficits in inhibitory control may interfere with decision-making processes, thereby impairing the execution of daily activities that require sustained attention and cognitive flexibility. Based on these findings of neural adaptions, it may be necessary to consider targeted interventions aimed at enhancing cognitive control and incorporating specific cortical training strategies for TTP users.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsBrainEvoked PotentialsNeuronal PlasticityAdultCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTibiaCognitive controlEvent-related potentials (ERPs)Neural adaptationNeural modificationTranstibial prosthesis (TTP) users

Identifiers

PMID40140863
PMCPMC11938703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.