Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140851›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

The proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN): a novel intramedullary nail for treating complex proximal femoral fractures and its biomechanical comparison with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).

Fang Zhou, Jixing Fan, Yang Lv

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fang Zhou *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. zhouf@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-069X
Jixing Fan *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-8234
Yang LvDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-2029

Funding

Peking University Third Hospital Y62419-06Science and Technology fund of Winter Olympics 2018YFF0301100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe loss of medial and lateral wall support were the main risk factors of implant failure for proximal femoral fractures. A novel intramedullary nail, called proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN), was proposed by our team to reconstruct the medial wall and lateral wall integrity and the biomechanical performance was evaluated in this study.

methodsThe synthetic femora were assigned to three groups randomly according to three different proximal femoral fracture types. For each group, the PFUN or PFNA were implanted separately and divided into PFUN subgroup and PFNA subgroup. Biomechanical tests were separately conducted in the axial compression test, torsional test, and fatigue test in sequence. The finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted by ANSYS 14.5 and we analyzed the von Mises stress distribution and the model displacement of two implant models in three different fracture types.

resultsFor proximal femoral fractures with intact medial wall and lateral wall, our biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a similar biomechanical property with the PFNA. Furthermore, the biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a larger axial stiffness, higher torsional strength, and a similar failure load when compared with the PFNA for proximal femoral fracture with medial wall fracture. For proximal femoral fractures with broken medial wall and lateral wall, a larger axial stiffness, higher average torque and higher failure load were found in the PFUN when compared with the PFNA. The FEA results showed that the PFUN model had a higher stress concentration compared with the PFNA model, and the total displacement of the PFNA model increased by 11.63% when compared with the PFUN model in the proximal femoral fracture with broken medial wall and lateral wall.

conclusionOur results showed that PFUN had better biomechanical performance than PFNA, especially for complex proximal femoral fractures with medial wall fracture and lateral wall fracture, indicating that the PFUN had great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.

Indexed as

Bone NailsFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansProximal Femoral FracturesRotationBiomechanical testFinite element analysisPFNAPFUNProximal femoral fracture

Identifiers

PMID40140851
PMCPMC11948893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.