Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140804›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Key factors influencing undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the use of learning management systems: a systematic literature review.

Fathiya Alkhuzaimi, Christine Brown Wilson, Wai Yee Amy Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fathiya AlkhuzaimiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland. falkhuzaimi01@qub.ac.uk.
Christine Brown WilsonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland. c.brownwilson@qub.ac.uk.
Wai Yee Amy WongSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe technological revolution has significantly transformed educational practices, particularly through the implementation of learning management systems (LMS). Understanding the perspectives of undergraduate nursing students regarding the use of LMS is essential, as these perceptions can significantly influence their learning experiences and outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify and explore the factors influencing these students' perceptions of LMS.

methodsA systematic review was conducted by searching five electronic databases-CINAHL Plus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library-for studies published between 2010 and 2020. An updated search was performed in July 2024 to ensure the inclusion of recent evidence. Studies were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on undergraduate nursing students and their experiences with LMS. The included studies utilised a range of designs: mixed-methods (4), cross-sectional (3), quantitative descriptive surveys (5), randomised controlled trials (1), qualitative (2), case studies (1), quasi-experimental (2), and observational (1). The quality of the studies was rigorously assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust (MKPCT) tools, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Data were synthesised through thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's framework.

resultsIn total, 19 studies were included in the review, encompassing a diverse range of research designs. The review identified several factors that significantly influenced students' acceptance and perception of LMS. These factors included students' digital literacy, prior experience with technology, motivation, and self-efficacy. Additionally, key organisational factors, such as instructor support and the availability of training, were associated with positive perceptions of the LMS. Specific features of the LMS, including ease of use, interactive elements, and accessibility, also contributed to enhancing students' perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU).

conclusionStudents' perceptions of LMS are closely linked to their acceptance of these platforms, as guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Digital literacy, prior technology experience, and self-efficacy emerged as critical factors positively influencing perceived usefulness and ease of use, leading to greater acceptance and satisfaction. Instructor support and interactive LMS features were also vital for enhancing engagement and learning outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering these factors in the design of LMS modules for undergraduate nursing students. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of LMS use on learning outcomes to inform best practices.

Indexed as

Blended learningExperienceLearning management systemNursing studentsPerception

Identifiers

PMID40140804
PMCPMC11948785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.