Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140754›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Explainable AI for Symptom-Based Detection of Monkeypox: a machine learning approach.

Gizachew Mulu Setegn, Belayneh Endalamaw Dejene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gizachew Mulu SetegnDepartment of Computer Science, Debark University, Debark, Ethiopian, Ethiopia. Gizachew.Mulu@dku.edu.et.
Belayneh Endalamaw DejeneDepartment of Information Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopian, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonkeypox, a viral zoonotic disease, is an emerging global health concern, with rising incidence and outbreaks extending beyond its endemic regions in Central and, West Africa and the world. The disease transmits through contact with infected animals and humans, leading to fever, rash, and lymphadenopathy symptoms. Control efforts include surveillance, contact tracing, and vaccination campaigns; however, the increasing number of cases underscores the necessity for a coordinated global response to mitigate its impact. Since monkeypox has become a public health issue, new methods for efficiently identifying cases are required. The control of monkeypox infections depends on early detection and prediction. This study aimed to utilize Symptom-Based Detection of Monkeypox using a machine-learning approach.

methodsThis research presents a machine learning approach that integrates various Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to enhance the detection of monkeypox cases based on clinical symptoms, addressing the limitations of image-based diagnostic systems. In this study, we used a publicly available dataset from GitHub containing clinical features about monkeypox disease. The data have been analysed using Random Forest, Bagging, Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, XGBoost, and LGBMClassifier to develop a robust predictive model.

resultsThe study shows that machine learning models can accurately diagnose monkeypox based on symptoms like fever, rash, lymphadenopathy and other clinical symptoms. By using XAI techniques for feature importance, the approach not only achieved high accuracy but also provided transparency in decision-making. This integration of explainable Artificial intelligence (AI) enhances trust and allows healthcare professionals to understand predictions, leading to timely interventions and improved public health responses to monkeypox outbreaks. All Machine learning methods have been compared with the evaluation matrix. The best performance was for the LGBMClassifier, with an accuracy of 89.3%. In addition, multiple Explainable Techniques tools were used to help in examining and explaining the output of the LGBMClassifier model.

conclusionsOur research shows that combining explainable techniques with AI models greatly enhances the accuracy of case detection and boosts the trust of medical professionals. These models result in directly involving the reader and health care professional in the decision-making process, making informed decisions, and efficiently allocating resources by providing insight into the decision-making process. In addition, this study underscores the potential of AI in public health surveillance, particularly in enhancing responses to emerging infectious diseases such as monkeypox.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMpox, MonkeypoxArtificial IntelligenceDisease OutbreaksHumansMonkeypox virusClinical symptomsHealthMachine learningMonkeypoxSHAPXAI

Identifiers

PMID40140754
PMCPMC11948964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.