ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Development and validation of an integrated prognostic model for all-cause mortality in heart failure: a comprehensive analysis combining clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Voice recognition as an innovative method to identify and monitor heart failure - a review.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate risk prediction in heart failure remains challenging due to its complex pathophysiology. We aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive prognostic model integrating demographic, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical parameters.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 445 heart failure patients. The cohort was randomly divided into training (n = 312) and validation (n = 133) sets. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise Cox regression. A nomogram was constructed based on independent predictors. Model performance was assessed through discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analyses. Random survival forest analysis was conducted to validate variable importance.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 4.14 years, 142 deaths (31.91%) occurred. Our model development followed a systematic approach: initial feature selection using LASSO regression identified 15 potential predictors, which were further refined to nine independent predictors through backward stepwise Cox regression. The final predictors included age, NYHA class, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, atrial septal defect, aortic valve annulus calcification, tricuspid regurgitation severity, QRS duration, T wave offset, and NT-proBNP. The integrated model demonstrated good discrimination for 2-, 3-, and 5-year mortality prediction in both training (AUCs: 0.726, 0.755, 0.809) and validation cohorts (AUCs: 0.686, 0.678, 0.706). Calibration plots and decision curve analyses confirmed the model's reliability and clinical utility across different time horizons. A nomogram was constructed for individualized risk prediction. Kaplan-Meier analyses of individual predictors revealed significant stratification of survival outcomes, while restricted cubic spline analyses demonstrated non-linear relationships between continuous variables and mortality risk. Random survival forest analysis identified the top five predictors (age, NT-proBNP, QRS duration, tricuspid regurgitation severity, NYHA), which were compared with our nine-variable model, confirming the superior performance of the integrated model across all time points.
conclusionsOur integrated prognostic model showed robust performance in predicting all-cause mortality in heart failure patients. The model's ability to provide individualized risk estimates through a nomogram may facilitate clinical decision-making and patient stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.