Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140747›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

MuPETFlow: multiple ploidy estimation tool from flow cytometry data.

C Gómez-Muñoz, G Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Gómez-MuñozLaboratory of Computational, Quantitative and Synthetic Biology (CQSB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, F-75005, France. cintia.gomez_munoz@sorbonne-universite.fr.
G FischerLaboratory of Computational, Quantitative and Synthetic Biology (CQSB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, F-75005, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE12-0020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPloidy, representing the number of homologous chromosome sets, can be estimated from flow cytometry data acquired on cells stained with a fluorescent DNA dye. This estimation relies on a combination of tools that often require scripting, individual sample curation, and additional analyses.

resultsTo automate the ploidy estimation for multiple flow cytometry files, we developed MuPETFlow-a Shiny graphical user interface tool. MuPETFlow allows users to visualize cell fluorescence histograms, detect the peaks corresponding to the different cell cycle phases, perform a linear regression using standards, make ploidy or genome size predictions, and export results as figures and table files. The tool was benchmarked with known ploidy datasets from yeast and plant species, yielding consistent ploidy results. MuPETFlow's peaks detection and performance were also compared to those of other tools.

conclusionsMuPETFlow stands out as the only tool offering in-app ploidy detection, multiple peak detection, multi-sample visualization, and automation capabilities. These features significantly accelerate the analysis, making it especially valuable for projects involving large datasets.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryPloidiesSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceCytometryGenomeGraphical user interfacePloidySoftware

Identifiers

PMID40140747
PMCPMC11948760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.