ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Trends in induction of labour and associated co-morbidities and demographics in Queensland, Australia from 2001 to 2020: a population-based study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in risk factors associated with the increasing labor induction rate: A nationwide register study in Finland 2005-2023.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmongst women who plan a vaginal birth at term, previous studies have reported that rates of induction of labour are increasing potentially impacting other labour and birth outcomes. Indications for induction of labour (IOL) have changed over time though the influences of parity and demographic factors such as age, ethnicity and regionality are not often considered. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in demographic, co-morbidity, IOL indication and clinical outcomes in women undertaking a planned cephalic vaginal birth at term over a 20 year period.
methodsA retrospective population-based study was undertaken using routinely collected anonymised perinatal data from Queensland, Australia from January 2001 to December 2020. We included all singleton term (≥ 37 weeks) planned vaginal births. A total of 836,065 births met the study criteria. Data for pregnancy complications and IOL indications were grouped by ICD-10 codes. Analysis was stratified by parity and presented as frequency and percentages over time and the difference in percentages between two defined years.
resultsRates of IOL increased by 15.5% (31.6 to 47.1%) in nulliparous and 14.6% (26.2 to 40.8% in multiparous women, most notable from 2015 onwards. Over the same period infants born between 37 and 38 weeks gestation increased by 13.9%. (18.1-32%). Amongst co-morbidities gestational diabetes increased from 3.8 to 12.8% and anaemia from 1.7 to 8.1%. As an indication for IOL prolonged pregnancy decreased from 41.0 to 11.2%. In nulliparous women the percentage of intact perineum decreased from 21.3 to 6.7% while episiotomy increased from 20.2 to 38.8%.
conclusionsWe conclude that for women planning a vaginal birth not only has the rate of IOL increased substantially over the last two decades there also appears to be considerable interaction between demographic, co-morbidity, IOL indications and clinical outcomes that warrants further large population-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.