ReviewBMC neurology2025
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of Corynebacterium striatum meningitis: case report and literature review.
Review in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment ofMicroorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo report a case of Corynebacterium striatum meningitis and conduct a comprehensive literature review to determine the clinical presentation, microbiology, and treatment approaches for these patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 75-year-old male patient presented with headache and fever; however, bacterial cultures of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) yielded negative results. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of CSF subsequently identified Corynebacterium striatum meningitis as the causative agent for meningitis. A systematic search was performed across various databases encompassing systematic reviews, cohort studies, case series, and case reports involving patients diagnosed with Corynebacterium striatum meningitis regardless of age. Clinical presentation characteristics and the most frequently employed diagnostic technologies were obtained. A narrative summary of the findings is presented.
resultsCorynebacterium striatum meningitis patients do not exhibit any specific age or sex predisposition or distinctive symptoms or signs. In patients with Corynebacterium striatum meningitis, CSF tests typically reveal an increased number of white blood cells (predominantly polymorphonuclear cells), elevated protein levels, and decreased glucose levels. Notably, the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Corynebacterium striatum has increased in recent years, leading to a gradual rise in antibiotic treatment failure rates. It is predicted that by 2030, vancomycin may be the sole effective drug available.
conclusionThe possibility of Corynebacterium striatum infection should be considered during clinical diagnosis and laboratory testing procedures for bacterial meningitis. mNGS can serve as a supplementary gold standard in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, effectively enhancing the detection rate of rare pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.