ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of atypical antipsychotics associated rhabdomyolysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential signal strength of male sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS database.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Psychotropic Drug Exposure and Safety: A Systematic Review Toward Personalized Dosing Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Muscle toxicity reports in FAERS: a disproportionality analysis with focus on rhabdomyolysis and cross-database assessment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Rhabdomyolysis secondary to Influenza A infection in a patient using antipsychotic and serotonergic agents: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhabdomyolysis is a potentially fatal adverse reaction mainly caused by certain medications. Few real-world studies have shown a clear association between atypical antipsychotics and rhabdomyolysis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between atypical antipsychotics and rhabdomyolysis using the FDA Adverse Event Report System (FAERS) database. The data were obtained from the FAERS database from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2023. To identify potential risk signals from the FAERS database, a disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with p-values adjusted via Bonferroni correction. The time to onset, hospitalization rate, and mortality of atypical antipsychotics associated rhabdomyolysis were also investigated. A total of 2360 rhabdomyolysis case reports from the FAERS database were considered. Quetiapine had the greatest proportion (27.75%). Olanzapine had the highest positive signal values of rhabdomyolysis. Statistically significant rhabdomyolysis RORs (95% CI) for atypical antipsychotics were (in descending order): olanzapine 4.02 (3.72-4.35), quetiapine 3.81 (0.53-27.6), ziprasidone 2.76 (2.19-3.49), risperidone 2.12 (1.91-2.35), aripiprazole 2 (1.8-2.21), clozapine 1.47 (1.31-1.64). In the time to onset analysis, all atypical antipsychotics associated rhabdomyolysis had early failure type characteristics, the risk of rhabdomyolysis occurrence would be gradually decreased over time. Our study highlights the importance of vigilant patient monitoring following the prescription of atypical antipsychotics to reduce the risk of rhabdomyolysis. It is necessary to monitor serum creatinine kinase (CK) level early, especially during dose adjustment or initiation of new atypical antipsychotics. This research may provide a valuable information for patients, clinicians, and others concerned with the safety of atypical antipsychotics, and optimize clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.