ArticleScientific reports2025
Determination of stiffness and strength parameters for the hardening soil model based on the simplicial homology global optimization and triaxial compressive test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Constitute model calibration and their parameter determination are essential to scientifically and accurately characterize soil mechanical behavior. However, this is a challenging task due to the complexity of the geomaterials in geotechnical engineering. This study developed a novel model parameters determination framework combining simplicial homology global optimization (SHGO) and triaxial compressive test. The triaxial compressive test was utilized to generate and record test data, which characterize the constitutive law and cover the mechanical behavior. SHGO was employed to capture the mechanical and failure mechanism by minimizing the discrepancy between the test strain-deviatoric stress curve and that predicted by the hardening soil (HS) model using the unknown model parameters. The developed framework was verified and illustrated by a synthetic example based on the HS model. The results show that the determined strain-deviatoric stress curve is in excellent agreement with the test curve. SHGO performed excellently during the determination of model parameters. Then, the developed framework was applied to an actual triaxial compressive test. The results conclude that the developed framework provides an excellent way to calibrate the model and determine its parameters using optimal technology based on test data. The developed framework provides a scientific, reliable, and promising framework for geomaterials' parameter determination and model calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.