ArticleScientific reports2025
Steel surface defect detection based on multi-layer fusion networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An efficient triple-domain YOLOv8 for real-time aluminum profile defect detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cross-Sectional Cladding Segmentation of Stainless-Steel/Carbon-Steel Clad Wire Rods Using an Improved U-Net with Multi-Scale Attention.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lightweight Visual Localization of Steel Surface Defects for Autonomous Inspection Robots Based on Improved YOLOv10n.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting defects on steel surfaces is crucial for ensuring product quality and production safety in industrial settings. Object detection using deep learning, particularly the YOLOv5 model, has become a widely adopted method for this purpose. However, the complex shapes of current steel surface defects pose challenges for precise detection, especially when using low-cost recognition devices with small resolution images. To address these challenges, we integrated the RepBi-PAN fusion network into YOLOv5, enhancing the detection capability for large targets in complex backgrounds. To mitigate issues related to the premature introduction of shallow features and decrease in Precision, we optimized the model structure by incorporating the DenseNet structure into the backbone for improved feature extraction. Additionally, we introduced the Normalized Attention Module (NAM) to enhance the detection capability for small targets. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the enhanced model, showing a 4.1% increase in mean average precision (mAP), a 3.2% improvement in precision, and a 2.4% enhancement in recall. The improved algorithm outperforms the original in complex backgrounds and recognizing small targets, addressing limitations of the Rep-Bi network. Compared to other YOLO algorithms, our approach achieves optimal values for recall and mAP while maintaining a smaller model size. When compared to YOLOv9, which is the best-performing algorithm in the YOLO series on the dataset used in this study, our model demonstrates several advantages. Specifically, it maintains superior overall performance with fewer parameters and lower computational requirements compared to deeper YOLOv9 variants. Furthermore, when compared to YOLOv9s, our model exhibits better performance in terms of precision, recall, and mAP, while also having fewer GFLOPs, a smaller parameter count, and a reduced model size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.