Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140643›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ripples formed in low-pressure wind tunnels suggest Mars's large windblown ripples are not impact ripples.

Carlos A Alvarez, Mathieu G A Lapôtre, Christy Swann, Ryan C Ewing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos A AlvarezDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. calvare7@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-5240
Mathieu G A LapôtreDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. mlapotre@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-1552
Christy SwannRCOAST, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-3092
Ryan C EwingAstromaterials & Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC20K0145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sand ripples record interactions between planetary surfaces and environmental flows, providing paleoenvironmental archives when preserved into rocks. Two main ripple types form in sand: drag ripples, common in water, and impact ripples, exclusive to windblown surfaces. Enigmatic meter-scale aeolian ripples on Mars have been assumed to be impact ripples, though ground and orbiter-based observations suggest they may be drag ripples instead. Here, we report on low-pressure wind tunnel experiments in which large ripples formed and evolved from a flat bed. Observations demonstrate that impact and large ripples grow from distinct mechanisms. Large-ripple size aligns with predictions from drag-ripple theory, and associated sand fluxes are greater than predicted for impact ripples. These findings are inconsistent with an impact-ripple origin and instead suggest that large martian ripples are drag ripples. Windblown drag ripples constitute an untapped record of atmospheric evolution on planetary bodies with tenuous or ephemeral atmospheres across the Solar System.

Identifiers

PMID40140643
PMCPMC11947197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.