ArticleLab animal2025
Differential effects of anesthetics and sex on supraventricular electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation substrate in rats.
Article in Lab animal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential effects of semaglutide and colchicine on atrial remodeling in rats with reduced ejection fraction after myocardial infarction.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rodents are increasingly used in atrial electrophysiology research, yet such studies are often performed under anesthesia owing to technical challenges. Here we developed an implantable device for comprehensive atrial studies in ambulatory rats and investigated the effects of commonly used anesthetics on supraventricular electrophysiology and arrhythmic substrate, comparing them with the unanesthetized state (UAS). Adult rats were evaluated 4 weeks after implantation. Studies were conducted in the UAS under 2% isoflurane (ISO) and under 40 mg/kg pentobarbital (PEN). Pacing protocols determined various parameters, including sinoatrial node recovery time, atrioventricular node effective refractory period and atrial effective refractory period. Arrhythmic substrate was assessed after 20 triggering bursts per condition, and arrhythmic tendency was analyzed manually and through the complexity ratio, an unbiased measure recently developed by our group. PEN mildly increased heart rate in both sexes, while ISO did not affect heart rate but prolonged the corrected sinus node recovery time in males. PEN increased atrioventricular node effective refractory period in both sexes, while ISO affected males only. Both ISO and PEN prolonged atrial effective refractory period compared with UAS in both sexes. Arrhythmic measures were higher in males and were attenuated by ISO and, to a lesser extent, by PEN in males only. The dominant frequency of arrhythmic events was reduced by both anesthetics in both sexes. These findings demonstrate a significant impact of commonly used anesthetics on rat supraventricular electrophysiology, with sex-based differences, highlighting the importance of methodologies that enable cardiac electrophysiology studies in unanesthetized rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.