Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140616›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Long-distance exploration in insightful problem-solving.

Zenas C Chao, Feng-Yang Hsieh, Chien-Te Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zenas C ChaoInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. zenas.c.chao@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-0851
Feng-Yang HsiehMicrosoft Mobile Experiences and Platform, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4599-6558
Chien-Te WuInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insight represents a sudden and profound understanding, offering a new perspective that can offer the solution to a previously intractable problem. Insight is tightly associated with an "Aha" experience. Although various theories have attempted to explain how insight emerges, the dynamic search process leading to insight remains poorly understood, primarily due to the complex nature of creative problem-solving. In this study, we employ two versions of the Japanese remote associates test (RAT) (n = 349 and n = 105 participants, respectively), alongside a simulation model. This allows us to quantitatively manipulate the constraints imposed on the problem and to track the search process within the solution space. Our findings indicate that the insight and the accompanying "Aha" moment are characterized by exploration that spans greater distances within the solution space, thereby increasing the number of potential solutions available for evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID40140616
PMCPMC11947100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.