Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Enzalutamide in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer according to the European Association of Urology definition: a post hoc analysis of EMBARK.
Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02319837 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide, Enzalutamide Monotherapy, and Placebo Plus Leuprolide in Men With High-Risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Progressing After Definitive Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide, Enzalutamide Monotherapy, and Placebo Plus Leuprolide in Men With High-Risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Progressing After Definitive Therapy
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocompatibility and Toxicity Evaluation of an Elastin-Based Nanogel Carrier for Enzalutamide: Comprehensive Characterization, Controlled Release and Assessment in Zebrafish Embryos.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Criteria Clinicians Use to Classify Patients as High Risk in Biochemically Recurrent Nonmetastatic Castration‑Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: key findings from subsequent analyses of EMBARK and their implications in clinical practice.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- Nuclear receptors as novel regulators that modulate cancer radiosensitivity and normal tissue radiotoxicity.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR) definition varies across clinical studies/practice guidelines. We evaluated metastasis-free survival (MFS) by blinded, independent, central review and safety in EMBARK (NCT02319837) patients defined as high-risk BCR per European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. Patients post-radical prostatectomy (prostatic-specific antigen doubling time ≤9 months) or post-radiation therapy with a Gleason score > 7, were considered EAU high-risk. MFS improved with enzalutamide + leuprolide (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25‒0.57) and enzalutamide monotherapy (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39‒0.83) versus leuprolide alone. MFS and safety for enzalutamide ± leuprolide versus leuprolide alone were similar in EMBARK patients with EAU-consistent or protocol-defined high-risk BCR. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02319837.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.