Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140528›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of task nature during short digital deprivation on time perception and psychophysiological state.

Quentin Meteier, Anouk Délèze, Sébastien Chappuis, Joanna Witowska, Marc Wittmann, Ruth Ogden, Chantal Martin-Sölch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Quentin MeteierClinical and Health Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland. qmeteier@gmail.com.
Anouk DélèzeClinical and Health Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Sébastien ChappuisClinical and Health Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Joanna WitowskaInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, 02-353, Poland.
Marc WittmannInstitute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Ruth OgdenSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, England.
Chantal Martin-SölchClinical and Health Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technological advances in recent years are influencing and redefining our daily lives, communications, and social relationships. While these advances bring us many benefits, their negative effects may also cause concern. Although often studied, the potential benefits of digital deprivation are still disputed. This laboratory study investigates the impact of short digital deprivation (7 min and 30 s) on the psychophysiological state and time perception of 90 participants. Three experimental conditions were created for the task performed during the waiting period (30 subjects per condition). Participants had to either freely use their smartphone, perform a non-digital task (sudoku), or wait (i.e. passive digital deprivation). Indicators of electrodermal activity and heart rate variability were calculated for the baseline and waiting periods, along with measures of subjective affective state. Four measures of time perception were also collected after the waiting period. Regardless of their experimental condition, the participants underestimated the duration of the waiting period on average (5 min 44 vs. 7 min 30). Passive digitally deprived participants felt that the time passed more slowly and were more bored than participants engaged in a task, regardless of whether the task was digital or not. Sudoku induced more positive affect and was more cognitively engaging than the free use of a smartphone regarding heart rate variability measures. The results suggest that performing a digital task (free smartphone use) is less cognitively demanding than a non-digital task (sudoku) and alters time perception in the same way. The digital nature of a task might also impact one's affective reaction. A similar study in the field with longer or repetitive digital deprivation periods and a different non-digital task to perform (e.g., reading news) should be conducted to confirm the results obtained in this study.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePsychophysiologySmartphoneYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40140528
PMCPMC11947215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.