Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140503›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of proximity of the sediment mining pit on riverbank stability.

Sukhjeet Arora, Bimlesh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sukhjeet AroraDepartment of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati, India.
Bimlesh KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati, India. bimk@iitg.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unregulated sediment dredging near riverbanks considerably increases the risk of bank failures. This study examines how the proximity of sediment mining pits influences riverbank stability by conducting controlled laboratory flume experiments on three riverbank slopes: 25°, 31°, and 40°. The analysis considers three scenarios-upstream pit, instream pit, and no-pit conditions while evaluating key hydraulic parameters, including mean streamwise velocity, Reynolds shear stress (RSS), and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). These measurements provide insights into flow dynamics, turbulence characteristics, and morphological changes. The results indicate that steeper slopes experience higher erosion risks. The 40° slope exhibits velocity increases of up to 35% and TKE peaks reaching 40% above baseline levels when a pit is in close proximity, leading to severe toe scouring and sediment detachment. In contrast, the 25° slope maintains hydraulic equilibrium, limiting velocity increases to 15% and experiencing minimal turbulence-induced erosion, making it the most stable configuration for reducing mining-related impacts. The 31° slope, corresponding to the angle of repose, strikes a balance between sediment mobility and stability but requires localized reinforcements to mitigate erosion. These findings highlight the need for well-regulated sediment mining practices and targeted riverbank stabilization strategies to reduce the growing risk of bank failures.

Indexed as

Reynolds shear stressRiverbank stabilitySediment miningTurbulent kinetic energy

Identifiers

PMID40140503
PMCPMC11947234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.