ReviewCommunications chemistry2025
Mechanical interlocking of metal organic cages.
Review in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase-dependent responsiveness in soft porous crystals assembled from flexible metal-organic cages.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Ligand isomerism in coordination cages: to interlock or not to interlock.Chemical science · 2026Article
- One Coordination Cage, Many Pathways: Multiple Stimuli Drive Reversible Transformations.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Precise synthesis of π-conjugated [3]catenanes and Solomon link for photothermal responses via a dual-tuning strategy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Robust Heterometallic PtAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Cooperative reversible assembly in triply interlocked AlChemical science · 2025Article
- Design strategies and emerging applications for mechanically interlocked molecules.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[2]-Catenanes formed from three-dimensional (3D) metal organic cages (MOCs) self-assembled from transition metals and organic ligands, hereafter called interlocked MOCs, constitute a relatively new class of mechanically interlocked materials (MIMs) that is receiving considerable research attention. This interest is mainly due to their esthetic synthetic aspects and mechanical properties, but also due to their potential applications in nanotechnological areas, including magnetic materials, guest selectivity, allosteric binding, or thermoresponsive behavior in elastomeric materials. In this article, a perspective on the research on interlocked MOCs (i.e., [2]-catenanes), covering from the first examples of interlocked MOCs to the latest research in this area is presented. The emphasis is in the synthetic methods used for their preparation and the structure‒function correlation aspects. The combination of experimental techniques in the solution state (i.e., NMR, ESI-MAS, etc.) and solid-state X-ray structural data, in combination with theoretical calculations have been very important to getting a rationalization of the experimental results. The described [2]-catenanes are formed from mechanically bonded hollow cages, therefore they can be exploited in host-guest chemistry applications typical from MOCs, with enhanced physical properties ranging from the mechanical bonds like enhanced cage's strength and dynamic behavior, which are needed for developing new smart functional materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.