ArticleScientific reports2025
SAMHD1 dysfunction impairs DNA damage response and increases sensitivity to PARP inhibition in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SAMHD1 drives immunosuppression in non-small cell lung cancer by promoting macrophage infiltration and restricting oncolytic adenovirus replication.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of SAMHD1 and phosphorylated ATM levels on the progression and prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a clinically and genetically heterogenous disease. Recent next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies have uncovered numerous low-frequency mutated genes in CLL patients, with SAMHD1 emerging as a candidate driver gene. However, the biological and clinical implications of SAMHD1 mutations remain unclear. Using CRISPR/Cas9, we generated CLL models to investigate the impact of SAMHD1 deficiency on pathogenesis and explore therapeutic strategies. Moreover, we performed NGS in treatment-naïve CLL patients to characterize SAMHD1 mutations and employed RNA-sequencing to evaluate their clinical significance. Our study shows that SAMHD1 inactivation impairs the DNA damage response by reducing homologous recombination efficiency through BRCA1 and RAD51 dysregulation. Importantly, SAMHD1 colocalizes with BRCA1 at DNA damage sites in CLL cells. This research also identifies that SAMHD1-mutated cells are more sensitive to PARP inhibition. Clinically, SAMHD1 dysfunction negatively impacts clinical outcome of CLL cases: SAMHD1 mutations reduce failure-free survival (median 46 vs 57 months, p = 0.033), while low SAMHD1 expression associates with shorter time to first treatment (median 47 vs 77 months; p = 0.00073). Overall, this study elucidates that SAMHD1 dysfunction compromises DNA damage response mechanisms, potentially contributing to unfavorable clinical outcomes in CLL, and proposes PARP-inhibitors as a potential therapeutic approach for SAMHD1-mutated CLL cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.