Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140460›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Recurrent and convolutional neural networks in classification of EEG signal for guided imagery and mental workload detection.

Filip Postepski, Grzegorz M Wojcik, Krzysztof Wrobel, Andrzej Kawiak, Katarzyna Zemla, Grzegorz Sedek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filip PostepskiDepartment of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 9, 20-031, Lublin, Poland. filip.postepski@mail.umcs.pl.
Grzegorz M WojcikDepartment of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 9, 20-031, Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof WrobelDepartment of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 9, 20-031, Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej KawiakDepartment of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 9, 20-031, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna ZemlaInstitute of Psychology, SWPS University, Chodakowska 19/31, Warsaw, 03-815, Poland.
Grzegorz SedekInstitute of Psychology, SWPS University, Chodakowska 19/31, Warsaw, 03-815, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Guided Imagery technique is reported to be used by therapists all over the world in order to increase the comfort of patients suffering from a variety of disorders from mental to oncology ones and proved to be successful in numerous of ways. Possible support for the therapists can be estimation of the time at which subject goes into deep relaxation. This paper presents the results of the investigations of a cohort of 26 students exposed to Guided Imagery relaxation technique and mental task workloads conducted with the use of dense array electroencephalographic amplifier. The research reported herein aimed at verification whether it is possible to detect differences between those two states and to classify them using deep learning methods and recurrent neural networks such as EEGNet, Long Short-Term Memory-based classifier, 1D Convolutional Neural Network and hybrid model of 1D Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory. The data processing pipeline was presented from the data acquisition, through the initial data cleaning, preprocessing and postprocessing. The classification was based on two datasets: one of them using 26 so-called cognitive electrodes and the other one using signal collected from 256 channels. So far there have not been such comparisons in the application being discussed. The classification results are presented by the validation metrics such as: accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score and loss for each case. It turned out that it is not necessary to collect signals from all electrodes as classification of the cognitive ones gives the results similar to those obtained for the full signal and extending input to 256 channels does not add much value. In Disscussion there were proposed an optimal classifier as well as some suggestions concerning the prospective development of the project.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyImagery, PsychotherapyNeural Networks, ComputerWorkloadAdultConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultCNNEEGGuided imageryLSTMMental workload

Identifiers

PMID40140460
PMCPMC11947268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.