ArticleScientific reports2025
Discovering interaction mechanisms in crowds via deep generative surrogate experiments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probabilistic dynamics of small groups in crowd flows.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding pedestrian crowd dynamics is a fundamental challenge in active matter physics and crucial for efficient urban infrastructure design. Complexity emerges from social interactions, which are often qualitatively modeled as distance-based additive forces. Endeavors towards quantitative characterizations have been limited by a trade-off between parametric control in laboratory studies and statistical resolution of large-scale real-world measurements. To bridge this gap, we propose a virtual surrogate experimentation paradigm that combines laboratory-like control with real-world statistical resolution. Our approach hinges on a generative simulation model based on graph neural networks, which we train on real-world pedestrian tracking data and validate against key statistical properties of crowd dynamics. Our surrogate experiments not only reproduce known experimental results on collision avoidance, but also reveal new insights into N-body interactions in crowds, which have remained poorly understood. We find that these interactions are topological, with individuals reacting to a limited number of neighbors within a narrow field of view. Our study exemplifies how data-driven approaches can uncover fundamental interaction structures in social systems, even when only uncontrolled measurements are available. This approach opens new avenues for scientific discovery in complex systems where laboratory studies are prohibitive, from crowd dynamics and animal behavior to opinion formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.