ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of physico-chemical properties of some molecules from Khaya Grandifoliola plant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three molecular compounds: A (17-epi-methyl-6-hydroxylangolensate), B (7-deacetoxy-7-oxogedunin) and C (7-deacetoxy-7R-hydroxygedunin) isolated from Khaya Grandifoliola, a plant of the Meliaceae family, able to protect the normal human hepatocyte cell line against paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity were studied using HF and DFT methods. It appears from this study that compound A has the greatest capacity of donating charges while compound B, which is the most reactive compound according to the HOMO-LUMO energy gap, has a greater capacity to accept charges. From the calculation of certain donor-acceptor parameters, it comes out that compound C is the most easily oxidizable substance and therefore the most effective free radical scavenger. Of the three molecular compounds, A is the best antioxidant while B is the best antireductant. From the values obtained for compounds A, B and C, we concluded that these compounds are better antioxidants than β-carotene and better antireductants than vitamins A, C and E. Compounds A, B, and C are less efficient electron acceptors than fluorine and more efficient electron donors than Na. The calculation of certain thermodynamic parameters shows that, the molecular compounds studied can easily bind to a biomolecular complex. UV-vis spectrum analysis shows that the maximum peaks are located in the UV region between 230 and 356 nm. The nonlinear optical parameters along with vibrational frequencies of these compounds were calculated and compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.