Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Balancing centralisation and decentralisation in federated learning for Earth Observation-based agricultural predictions.

Robert Cowlishaw, Nicolas Longépé, Annalisa Riccardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. From data to decisions: Toward a Biodiversity Monitoring Standards Framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert CowlishawMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK. robert.cowlishaw.2017@uni.strath.ac.uk.
Nicolas Longépé *Ф-lab, European Space Agency, 00044, Frascati, Italy.
Annalisa Riccardi *Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop yield prediction using Earth Observation data presents challenges due to the diverse data modalities and the limited availability of relevant datasets, which are often proprietary or private. Decentralised federated learning has been proposed as a solution to address these privacy concerns as no data labels will have to be distributed to a third party. However, the performance of federated learning is significantly influenced by the number of clients and the distribution of data among them. This study investigates the impact of aggregation levels on federated learning using a proxy model trained on crop type data derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2 images. Interaction of these aggregation levels with other parameters is simulated and studied to aim to generalise the results to different situations. The analysis also includes an examination of the current and future distributions of crop yield datasets to determine the optimal aggregation levels for effective federated learning. The findings highlight that dataset size directly affects the learning outcomes as well as the degree of privacy that can be maintained. Other scenarios and the implications of these results are discussed for a future crop-yield decentralised federated learning architecture.

Indexed as

Agriculture predictionsCrop typeCrop yieldDecentralised federated learningEarth ObservationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40140432
PMCPMC11947316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.