Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140408›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A feasibility study of distress screening with psychometric evaluation and referral of cancer patients.

Daniel Anderson, Panagiotis J Vlachostergios, Lilly Simpson, Susanna Schuster Bruce, Niall Fitzpatrick, Jacqueline Connell, Eleftherios Christodoulis, Konstantinos Kamposioras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel AndersonDepartment of Psycho-Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Panagiotis J VlachostergiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, IASO Thessalias Hospital, Larissa, Greece.
Lilly SimpsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Susanna Schuster BruceDepartment of Psycho-Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Niall FitzpatrickDepartment of Psycho-Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jacqueline ConnellDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Eleftherios ChristodoulisDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Konstantinos KamposiorasDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. konstantinos.kamposioras@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess for associations of known psychometric scales GAD-7, PHQ-9, pc-PTSD-5 with demographics and clinical characteristics of cancer patients as well as identify their value in screening for distress and in guiding Psycho-Oncology evaluation. This prospective feasibility study employed three psychological testing questionnaires, specifically the GAD-7, PHQ-9, and PC-PTSD-5, for the purpose of distress screening. Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer who scored highly on at least one psychometric scale (defined in previous studies of non-cancer populations as a GAD-7 score of 10 or above, a PHQ-9 score of 10 or above, or a PC-PTSD-5 score of 4 or above) were offered a referral for further assessment in the Psycho-Oncology service and triaged via a semi-structured interview. The relationship between patients' demographics and clinical characteristics and scores and outcomes was evaluated using the chi-square test. Fifty-four patients (30 females) of median age 60 years (range 36-81) were evaluated in the study. Thirty-four patients (63%) scored high on GAD-7, 40 (74%) on PHQ-9, and 8 (15%) on PC-PTSD-5 scales, respectively. Twenty-nine out of the 54 patients who underwent initial assessment with the psychometric scales (53.7%) accepted to be referred to the Psycho-Oncology service and were triaged via semi-structured interview while the rest 25/54 (46.3%) patients declined further assessment. Twenty-two of the patients who were interviewed (76%) required further specialist Psycho-Oncology intervention and the rest were signposted to community services. Patients younger than 65 years of age were more likely to score high according to the GAD-7 tool (p = 0.036). White Caucasian patients tended to score higher in the PHQ-9 questionnaire compared to non-white ones (p = 0.07). Prior history of mental disorder was significantly associated with higher scores in both GAD-7 (p = 0.041) and PC-PTSD-5 tools (p = 0.016). Patients who accepted a referral for psycho-oncology intervention demonstrated statistically elevated levels of anxiety on GAD-7 (p = 0.007) and diminished levels of depression on PHQ-9 (p = 0.042) compared to those who declined the referral. A clinical pathway involving a stepwise approach of psychometric scale evaluation and semi-structured interview can appropriately identify cancer patients with distress requiring further psychological support.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPsychological DistressPsychometricsStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationAnxietyCancerDepressionPsycho-oncologyScreening

Identifiers

PMID40140408
PMCPMC11947445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.