ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Outcomes in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma refractory or intolerant to brentuximab vedotin and anti-PD-1 therapy: a real world analysis from 15 U.S. academic centers.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD30 CAR-T cells in combination with anti-PD-1 camrelizumab in relapsed/refractory CD30Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Real-world evidence for pembrolizumab gemcitabine vinorelbine and liposomal doxorubicin in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors of lymphocyte-depleted classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a population-based SEER analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Anti-TIM-3 antibody TQB2618 in combination with penpulimab in relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma previously treated with PD-1/PD-L1 therapy: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase Ib clinical trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Evolution of therapeutic paradigms in Hodgkin lymphoma: from "cure-oriented" to "functional cure".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies and Derivatives: Therapeutic Tools for Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-PD-1 based therapies and brentuximab vedotin (BV) have significantly improved survival in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and have been incorporated into earlier lines of therapy. However, there is insufficient data regarding the clinical outcomes in patients who develop refractory disease or who become intolerant of BV and anti-PD-1 therapies (double refractory/intolerant; DR/INT). Here, we evaluated outcomes in patients with DR/INT cHL from 15 US academic medical centers. A total of 173 patients were identified as DR/INT. The median overall survival from the time of cHL diagnosis (OS-1) was 14.8 years (95% CI: 10.9-20.9 years) and the 10-year OS-1 estimate was 62% (95% CI: 52-70%). After accounting for differences in age, patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant prior to developing DR/INT had significantly longer OS-1 (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96, p = 0.04). Median OS from time of DR/INT (OS-2) was 7.4 years (95% CI: 4.3-NR) and the 5-year OS-2 estimate was 57% (95% CI: 48-66%). Both anti-PD-1 and BV based therapy rechallenge were effective with median PFS of 237 days (95% CI: 155-357 days) and 183 days (95% CI: 108-273 days), respectively. Finally, advanced therapy options such as CD30 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplant after DR/INT were associated with improved OS-2 (p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of patients with DR/INT cHL. OS-2 will serve as a benchmark for future studies aiming to improve survival in DR/INT cHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.