Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140345›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

External acidity as performance descriptor in polyolefin cracking using zeolite-based materials.

Sebastian Rejman, Zoé M Reverdy, Zeynep Bör, Jaap N Louwen, Carolin Rieg, Joren M Dorresteijn, Jan-Kees van der Waal, Eelco T C Vogt, Ina Vollmer, Bert M Weckhuysen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CoAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian RejmanInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-6372
Zoé M ReverdyInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3545-7422
Zeynep BörInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jaap N LouwenInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-6973
Carolin RiegInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-3414
Joren M DorresteijnInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0858-3146
Jan-Kees van der WaalTNO, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-6109
Eelco T C VogtInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-4283
Ina VollmerInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.vollmer@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-1499
Bert M WeckhuysenInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. b.m.weckhuysen@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-1426

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) ARC CBBC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal pyrolysis is gaining industrial adoption to convert large volumes of plastic waste into hydrocarbon feedstock. However, it suffers from a high reaction temperature and relatively low selectivity. Utilizing a catalyst in the process, moving from thermal pyrolysis to catalytic cracking could help overcome both challenges. In order to develop efficient catalyst materials for this process, understanding structure-composition-performance relationships is critical. In this work, we show that in contrast to cracking of small molecules, plastic cracking activity using ultrastable zeolite Y materials does not depend on the bulk Brønsted acid site content, but rather on the concentration of acid sites located on the outer surface and in mesopores. This external acidity, however, fails to capture all the observed performance trends. Detailed kinetic experiments reveal that the scaling of the reaction rate with the catalyst loading differs drastically between highly similar catalyst materials. More specifically, doubling the catalyst loading leads to doubling of the reaction rate for one material, while for another it leads to more than fivefold increase. When very bulky reactants, such as polyolefins, are converted over microporous catalysts, structure-composition-performance relationships established for smaller molecules need to be revisited.

Identifiers

PMID40140345
PMCPMC11947190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.