ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025
Continuous theta burst stimulation to the medial posterior cerebellum impairs reversal learning in healthy volunteers.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of intermittent theta-burst stimulation versus continuous theta-burst stimulation for major depressive disorder and bipolar depression: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Target Interpretability and Functional Mapping of rTMS and Theta-Burst Stimulation of the Cerebellar Vermis and Midline Cerebellum: A Scoping Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Advances in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychological symptom management in Parkinson's disease.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on reversal learning performance during threat of shock.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of the cerebellum in associative learning and context-updating implies involvement in learning reward-punishment contingencies. This study examined the direct contribution of the cerebellum to reward- and punishment-based reversal learning. A total of 111 healthy right-handed adult volunteers received continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to either the medial posterior cerebellum (n = 37), right posterolateral cerebellum (n = 37), or right occipital lobe (n = 37) in this single-blind between-subjects study. A gambling task with two changing reward-punishment contingencies (reversals) was administered to assess reversal learning rate and the implementation of the optimal strategy as primary endpoints. As secondary endpoints, heart rate variability (HRV), state anxiety, state anger, trait aggression, and trait impulsivity were assessed to examine interactions with cerebellar cTBS on the implementation of the optimal strategy. Results showed that medial posterior cerebellar cTBS compared with right posterolateral cerebellar and right occipital lobe cTBS reduced learning rate after the first reversal and diminished the implementation of the optimal strategy after learning the second reversal. No interactions of cTBS with HRV, state anxiety, state anger, trait aggression, and trait impulsivity on the implementation of the optimal strategy were observed. Our findings provide evidence for involvement of the cerebellum in reward- and punishment-based reversal learning and behavioral adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.