SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Proportions.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Src and Abl as Therapeutic Targets in Lung Cancer: Opportunities for Drug Repurposing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMetastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) present challenging clinical management. Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy, improving survival and reducing tumor burden in the neoadjuvant use, facilitating surgical intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in metastatic/recurrent GISTs, highlighting its potential to enhance surgical outcomes and overall patient management.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Scopus (end-of-search: February 13, 2025) for records on neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in recurrent/metastatic GISTs. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with common-effect and random-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis were performed, addressing heterogeneity and examining any potential association between the factors that varied and the outcomes reported. The present meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
resultsThe search identified 957 articles, and 14 were analyzed. The meta-analysis of proportions indicated that 2-year and 5-year PFS were 76% (95% CI 58-88%) and 43% (95% CI 17-74%), respectively, while 2-year and 5-year OS were 84% (95% CI 78-89%) and 60% (95% CI 51-68%), respectively. The pooled R0 resection rate was 82% (95% CI 64-92%), associated positively with that of radiological partial response (PR) (β = 3.92, p < 0.001). Further meta-regression analysis yielded no significant association with preoperative imatinib duration.
conclusionThe present meta-analysis of trials and studies on metastatic or recurrent GISTs highlights key insights into post-surgery patient outcomes following neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib. Pooled effect estimates revealed promising 2-year and 5-year PFS rates of 76% and 43%, respectively, and 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 84% and 60%, respectively. Furthermore, the high pooled R0 resection rate of 82% emphasizes a substantial surgical efficacy in this population, while it was significantly correlated with successful R0 resections in patients with favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.