ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Establishing a Platform Method for Physical Appearance Assessment of New Parenteral Pharmaceuticals.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical appearance (PA) is an attribute indicating the quality of parenteral pharmaceuticals. It is routinely evaluated during release and stability testing and included in regulatory filings. PA assessment of liquids involves three tests: visible particulates, clarity, and color. For each test, compendial general method chapters are available requiring minimal modification. This allows for a platform PA method approach, streamlining method readiness for new test articles. However, selecting the appropriate method is challenging, as no method suits all test articles, and pharmacopeias do not specify suitable condition(s) for each method. Improper method selection can lead to inappropriate specification setting and unreliable results. The need for guidance is especially urgent for vaccines, which often exhibit a wide range of PA attributes due to complex delivery systems and adjuvants that boost immunogenicity. This manuscript addresses this challenge by explaining method suitability and presenting a decision table for PA method selection based on the appearance properties of pharmaceuticals. A case study involving a yellow-turbid vaccine adjuvant is presented to demonstrate the practical application of the decision table. When color and turbidity make visual comparison to reference liquids difficult, instrumental clarity and visual qualitative methods are suitable options. The manuscript provides valuable insights on PA method selection and setting specifications for new parenteral pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the decision table enables platform methods for test articles sharing similar appearance properties, eliminating the need for individual methods, reducing document preparation time for method and verification protocol, and enhancing the consistency and efficiency of GMP testing for PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40140160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.