Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140151›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Dynamic Fracture Fixation Plates: A Systematic Review of Evolving Design Approaches.

Connor Huxman, April Armstrong, Gary Updegrove, Gregory S Lewis, Jared Butler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical validation of 3D-printed orthopaedic surrogate models for screw insertion training.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Finite element andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Connor HuxmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 137 Reber Bldg, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. huxman@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-2771
April ArmstrongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-9811
Gary UpdegroveDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1594-7411
Gregory S LewisDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-0182
Jared ButlerSchool of Engineering Design and Innovation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3526-9678

Funding

Fracture Fixation Biomechanics Simulator with Adaptive Virtual CoachingR01EB029207 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LEWIS, GREGORY STEPHEN, REID , JOHN SPENCE · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
National Science Foundation 2410029NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029207NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB029207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture fixation with standard locked plates can suppress interfragmentary motion beneficial for secondary bone healing. To address this limitation, dynamic fracture fixation plates have been developed which seek to maintain bending and torsional rigidity while providing controlled axial micromotion. This article provides a comprehensive systematic review of the history and current state of proposed dynamic plating technologies to better inform future development. 59 records (51 articles, 8 patents) describing 26 unique dynamic plating devices were identified across three literature and patent databases using PRISMA review guidelines. Concepts were grouped into one of 9 engineering approach categories, including plates that incorporate sliding mechanisms, elastic inserts, lattice structures, and mechanically compliant flexures, among others. Devices are compared in their technological characteristics, ranges of axial motion, stiffnesses, and levels of development. Despite many dynamic technologies demonstrating good healing results experimentally and clinically, widespread clinical adoption has not occurred. Some explanations for this are provided, including production costs for complex designs and the current co-existence of both rigid and flexible fixation approaches. Overall, dynamic plating offers a promising area of innovation to address the ongoing concerns of non-union rates associated with standard locked plating of long bone fractures.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansBridge platingDynamic platingFracture fixationImplant designMicromotion

Identifiers

PMID40140151
PMCPMC13308085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.