ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Severity of obstructive sleep apnea diagnosed incidentally during gastrointestinal endoscopy under conscious sedation.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical predictors of underlying severe obstructive sleep apnea in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under conscious sedation.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt remains unclear whether patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) incidentally while undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under conscious sedation (GE-CS) have predominantly mild disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe evaluated differences in the disease characteristics, severity and treatments received between patients who were suspected as having OSA during GE-CS (GE group, n = 56) and patients who visited our hospital with a history of OSA-related symptoms (SY group, n = 123).
resultsThe median age of patients, percentage of men and percentage of patients with obesity were 54 years, 68%, and 21% in the GE group and 51 years, 78%, and 31% in the SY group, respectively. The percentages of patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA were 18%, 36%, and 43% in the GE group and 30%, 17%, and 39% in the SY group, respectively. The percentages of patients with subjective symptoms (e.g., daytime sleepiness/tiredness, 61% vs. 75%, p = 0.056) and scores on the Epworth sleepiness scale of ≥ 11 (18% vs. 37%, p = 0.009) were lower in the GE group, whereas there was no difference in the proportion of patients with objective symptoms (e.g., loud snoring or apnea, 70% vs. 70%) between the two groups. Patients with moderate-to-severe OSA who received continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy were fewer in the GE group (34% vs. 65%, p = 0.001).
conclusionA large percentage of patients with OSA diagnosed incidentally while undergoing GE-CS had moderate-to-severe disease but refused CPAP as they often had few subjective symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40140140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.