Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140102›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Overweight and obesity in early childhood and obesity at 10 years of age: a comparison of World Health Organization definitions.

Andraea Van Hulst, Sophie Zheng, Nikolas Argiropoulos, Marina Ybarra, Geoff D C Ball, Lisa Kakinami

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andraea Van HulstIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mcgill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada. andraea.vanhulst@mcgill.ca.
Sophie ZhengIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mcgill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Nikolas ArgiropoulosDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Marina YbarraDepartment of Pediatrics, London Health Sciences Centre, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, Western University, London, Canada.
Geoff D C BallDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Lisa KakinamiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends using + 2 SD of body mass index z-score (zBMI) to define overweight/obesity (OWO) in children ages 2 to 5 years whereas + 1 SD is used as cut-point from 5 years onwards. Empirical evidence for using different cut-points across childhood is lacking. Our objective was to compare the ability of OWO in early childhood defined using zBMI cut-points at + 2 SD and + 1 SD to predict obesity at 10 years. Data from a prospective birth cohort (QLSCD) were analyzed. At ages 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 years, children were classified as OWO based on + 2 SD and + 1 SD zBMI cut-points. At 10 years, obesity was assessed (zBMI and waist circumference). Associations between OWO (vs non-OWO) and later obesity were estimated using multivariable linear regressions. Outcome predictions for each cut-point were compared using partial eta-squared values. The sample included 1092 children (53% female). OWO in early childhood was 2-3 times more prevalent when using + 1 SD vs + 2 SD cut-points. In relation to later obesity, partial eta-squared values for both cut-points of OWO were in the small to medium effect size range (ranging from 3 to 15%), suggesting that OWO regardless of cut-point contributed only modestly to obesity measured at 10 years. However, across all time points, eta-squared values were slightly higher for OWO defined at + 1 SD vs + 2 SD, indicating a higher proportion of variance in outcomes being accounted for at zBMI + 1 SD. Conclusion: In children 2 to 5 years old, both definitions of OWO had small to modest effect sizes in relation to obesity in childhood albeit with a marginally superior predictive ability of the + 1 SD over the + 2 SD cut-point across early childhood. From a clinical perspective, using a single cut-point from early childhood onwards may be more practical to monitor growth and weight gain over time and identify children at risk of persistent obesity. What is Known: • The World Health Organization recommends using zBMI cut-points at + 2 SD for children ages 2-5 years, and + 1 SD from 5 years onwards to define overweight/obesity • Research is needed to determine which zBMI cut-point (+ 2 SD or + 1 SD) in children under 5 years best predicts subsequent obesity What is New: • Both definitions of overweight/obesity in early childhood contributed modestly to obesity at 10 years, with + 1 SD being marginally more effective than + 2 SD • Using a single cut-point at + 1 SD across childhood may be more practical for monitoring growth, weight gain, and identifying children at risk of persistent obesity.

Indexed as

OverweightPediatric ObesityBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesWaist CircumferenceWorld Health OrganizationBody mass indexEarly childhoodObesity definitionsOverweight and obesityWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.