SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Costal Surgery for Waist Improvement Safety and Efficacy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rib remodeling as a thoracic feminization strategy in transfeminine patients: Case report.JPRAS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBody contouring surgery has gained increasing popularity. Waist reduction has become central to body contouring, particularly in Latin America, where hip stylization is a beauty standard. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of costal cosmetic surgery for waistline improvement and to assess the quality of the evidence.
methodsSearch Methods for Study Identification: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed and other databases using the following keywords: "Removal rib," "Remodeling Rib," "Waist narrowing," "Waist-hip ratio," "Body contouring," "Aesthetic surgery," "Plastic surgery" and "Complications." SELECTION OF STUDIES: We included all studies regarding surgery on the ribs with the aim of improve (narrow) the waist for cosmetic purposes.
resultsOf the 161 studies identified, 8 met inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective case series, with two being multicentric. A total of 444 participants were included, predominantly women. Five studies involved costal remodeling, and three performed costal resection. Anthropometric outcomes were reported in 6 studies. Complications included pain, pneumothorax and wound dehiscence. Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 6 months.
conclusionWhile rib resection and remodeling appear to be safe techniques, their long-term efficacy remains uncertain. Studies with rigorous designs and longer follow-up are needed to establish robust evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40140086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.