Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140065›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2025

Spondyloarthritis endgame: MRI versus BoneMRI in sacroiliitis.

Kelly Di Dier, Frederiek Laloo, Thomas Van Den Berghe, Elke Vereecke, Jacob Jaremko, Min Chen, Lennart Jans

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly Di DierDepartment of Radiology, UZ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. kellydidier@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5857-5048
Frederiek LalooDepartment of Radiology, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas Van Den BergheDepartment of Radiology, UZ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Elke VereeckeDepartment of Radiology, UZ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Jacob JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Min ChenDepartment of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lennart JansDepartment of Radiology, UZ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria characterize sacroiliitis by active inflammation and structural lesions. Detection of lesions such as bone marrow edema, joint surface erosions and ankylosis is important, because progressing treatment options benefit from early diagnosis and detailed treatment response monitoring. Recent technological advancements have made various imaging modalities available to assess these findings, i.e., various sorts of CT (low dose, dual energy, etc.), MRI and BoneMRI. BoneMRI is an advanced technique where CT-like images are reconstructed from a dedicated MRI sequence, opening opportunities to better characterize structural lesions than on a classic MRI study. The scope of this review is to provide an overview of the pros and cons of MRI and BoneMRI in sacroiliitis and demonstrate the inherent added value of BoneMRI towards state-of-the-art routine MRI sequences.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliitisSpondylarthritisHumansSacroiliac JointAxial spondyloarthritisBoneMRIMRISacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID40140065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.