Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140005›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Long-term clinical and audiometric outcomes after the implantation of piezoelectric bone conduction devices in children: a prospective cohort study.

Faisal Zawawi, Afnan F Bukhari, Sara A Khairy, Mohamed Garrada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faisal ZawawiDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. faisalzawawi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-407X
Afnan F BukhariDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sara A KhairyDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed GarradaDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone conduction devices are hearing assistive devices that are used in many children who have conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss or single sided deafness. The aim of this study is to assess long-term outcomes of children who underwent piezoelectric bone conductive device implantation.

methodA prospective cohort of children who underwent Osia system implantation (OSI200) between the period of Jan 2021 and December 2022. The main Outcome measures were; Long-term complications, hearing thresholds, speech discrimination, sound localization and quality of life.

results25 children were implanted with 27 devices. The median surgical time 39 min. 6 children had single sided deafness, 21 ears had conductive hearing loss due to microtia/canal atresia (20 ears) or chronic ear disease (1 ear). None of the patients had any major adverse events. In children with conductive hearing loss, the median threshold of improvement was 37.5 dB. All patients reported significant improvement of their auditory function. Aided thresholds were best at 1 kHz (median 20 dB HL). Recorded gains were measured up 8000 Hz reflecting good auditory performance even at high frequencies. Speech Discrimination when using the Osia was 89% and self-reported hearing and quality of life by participants improved in all domains assessed.

conclusionOsia system is a safe and effective solution to restore hearing without any major long term complications. It provides auditory benefits that covers a wide range of frequencies. Children had significant improvement in their ability to sound localize as well as QoL. Osia surgery can be performed in a routine day surgery setting safely in children.

Indexed as

Bone ConductionHearing AidsHearing Loss, ConductiveHearing Loss, UnilateralProsthesis ImplantationAdolescentAudiometryAuditory ThresholdChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSound LocalizationBone conductionChildrenHearing lossOutcomePiezoelectric

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.