ReviewJournal of forensic sciences2025
Human tissue oxygen and strontium isotope values in North America: A data compilation and assessment for forensic geolocation.
Review in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable isotopes from Earth science to bedside medicine: beyond tracers and toward mechanistic biomarkers in medical oncology.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Strontium isoscapes for provenance, mobility and migration: the way forward.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Human tissue oxygen and strontium isotope values in North America: A data compilation and assessment for forensic geolocation.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of isotopic analysis for human mobility, geolocation, and forensic identification has become common over the past two decades, yet its effectiveness depends on the availability of well-documented reference data. Many reference data exist in the literature, but the suitability of these data for forensic applications has not been critically assessed. Here, we compile oxygen and strontium isotope data for North American human tissues (hair, nails, bone, and tooth enamel). We review the geographic distribution of these data, evaluate their relationship with the predicted geographic variation, and assess potential sources of bias that may limit the comparability of different datasets in the compilation. A substantial number of data are available for some of these substrates and isotope systems, but in most cases, their geographic distribution is patchy with many areas under sampled. Except for hair Sr isotopes, a robust relationship occurs between human tissue values and modeled local environmental values, suggesting theoretically expected relationships between human tissues and local sources of O and Sr are expressed. These relationships are noisy; we identify several methodological differences that produce systematic biases across the compiled data. Based on these findings, we suggest interpreting forensic isotope data using currently published reference data is problematic. We propose the adoption of consistent metadata reporting and standardized laboratory protocols to enhance the utility of data gathered in future research as these practices could lead to measurable improvements in the strength of forensic interpretations derived from human tissue isotope data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.