Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139932›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025

Evidence for Auditory Stimulus-Specific Adaptation But Not Deviance Detection in Larval Zebrafish Brains.

Maya Wilde, Rebecca E Poulsen, Wei Qin, Joshua Arnold, Itia A Favre-Bulle, Jason B Mattingley, Ethan K Scott, Sarah J Stednitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maya WildeQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rebecca E PoulsenDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Wei QinDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Joshua ArnoldQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Itia A Favre-BulleQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jason B MattingleyQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Ethan K ScottQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sarah J StednitzDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8223-1528

Funding

An integrated platform for studying sensory networks in the vertebrate brainR01NS118406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI SCOTT, ETHAN KIME · 2023 to 2024
$747k
Australian Research Council DP110103612Australian Research Council DP140102036Australian Research Council FT110100887National Health and Medical Research Council APP1066887NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118406Simons Foundation 399432Simons Foundation 625793Simons Foundation 873809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals receive a constant stream of sensory input, and detecting changes in this sensory landscape is critical to their survival. One signature of change detection in humans is the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN), a neural response to unexpected stimuli that deviate from a predictable sequence. This process requires the auditory system to adapt to specific repeated stimuli while remaining sensitive to novel input (stimulus-specific adaptation [SSA]). MMN was originally described in humans, and equivalent responses have been found in other mammals and birds, but it is not known to what extent this deviance detection circuitry is evolutionarily conserved. Here we present the first evidence for SSA in the brain of a teleost fish, using whole-brain calcium imaging of larval zebrafish at single-neuron resolution with selective plane illumination microscopy. We found frequency-specific responses across the brain with variable response amplitudes for frequencies of the same volume and created a loudness curve to model this effect. We presented an auditory "oddball" stimulus in an otherwise predictable train of pure tone stimuli and did not find a population of neurons with specific responses to deviant tones that were not otherwise explained by SSA. Further, we observed no deviance responses to an unexpected omission of a sound in a repetitive sequence of white noise bursts. These findings extend the known scope of auditory adaptation and deviance responses across the evolutionary tree and lay groundwork for future studies to describe the circuitry underlying auditory adaptation at the level of individual neurons.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAuditory PerceptionBrainEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAcoustic StimulationAnimalsLarvaNeuronsZebrafishauditory | calcium imaging | deviance detection | mismatch negativity (MMN) | stimulus‐specific adaptation | zebrafish

Identifiers

PMID40139932
PMCPMC11946781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.