Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139909›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

High-fidelity wheat plant reconstruction using 3D Gaussian splatting and neural radiance fields.

Lewis A G Stuart, Darren M Wells, Jonathan A Atkinson, Simon Castle-Green, Jack Walker, Michael P Pound

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Deep learning in plant phenotyping: the first ten years.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lewis A G StuartSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-0908-4148
Darren M WellsSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4246-4909
Jonathan A AtkinsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-0812
Simon Castle-GreenSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0681-2555
Jack WalkerSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Michael P PoundSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-1078

Funding

University of Nottingham
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reconstruction of 3-dimensional (3D) plant models can offer advantages over traditional 2-dimensional approaches by more accurately capturing the complex structure and characteristics of different crops. Conventional 3D reconstruction techniques often produce sparse or noisy representations of plants using software or are expensive to capture in hardware. Recently, view synthesis models have been developed that can generate detailed 3D scenes, and even 3D models, from only RGB images and camera poses. These models offer unparalleled accuracy but are currently data hungry, requiring large numbers of views with very accurate camera calibration.

resultsIn this study, we present a view synthesis dataset comprising 20 individual wheat plants captured across 6 different time frames over a 15-week growth period. We develop a camera capture system using 2 robotic arms combined with a turntable, controlled by a re-deployable and flexible image capture framework. We trained each plant instance using two recent view synthesis models: 3D Gaussian splatting (3DGS) and neural radiance fields (NeRF). Our results show that both 3DGS and NeRF produce high-fidelity reconstructed images of a plant subject from views not captured in the initial training sets. We also show that these approaches can be used to generate accurate 3D representations of these plants as point clouds, with 0.74-mm and 1.43-mm average accuracy compared with a handheld scanner for 3DGS and NeRF, respectively.

conclusionWe believe that these new methods will be transformative in the field of 3D plant phenotyping, plant reconstruction, and active vision. To further this cause, we release all robot configuration and control software, alongside our extensive multiview dataset. We also release all scripts necessary to train both 3DGS and NeRF, all trained models data, and final 3D point cloud representations. Our dataset can be accessed via https://plantimages.nottingham.ac.uk/ or https://https://doi.org/10.5524/102661. Our software can be accessed via https://github.com/Lewis-Stuart-11/3D-Plant-View-Synthesis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalTriticumAlgorithmsNormal DistributionSoftware3D Gaussian splatting3DGS3D reconstructiondigital twinimagingmachine learningNeRFneural radiance fieldsphenotypingroboticsview synthesis

Identifiers

PMID40139909
PMCPMC11945317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.