Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139803›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Effect of Extrinsic Reward on Motor Plasticity during Skill Learning.

Goldy Yadav, Pierre Vassiliadis, Cecile Dubuc, Friedhelm C Hummel, Gerard Derosiere, Julie Duque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Goldy YadavInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium goldy.yadav@uclouvain.be.
Pierre VassiliadisInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-0339
Cecile DubucInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium.
Friedhelm C HummelDefitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva 1202, Switzerland.
Gerard DerosiereUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), U1028 UMR5292, Impact Team, Bron F-69500, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8283-1569
Julie DuqueInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-7097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human motor skill acquisition is improved by performance feedback, and coupling such feedback with extrinsic reward (such as money) can enhance skill learning. However, the neurophysiology underlying such behavioral effect is unclear. To bridge this gap, we assessed the effects of reward on multiple forms of motor plasticity during skill learning. Sixty-five healthy participants divided into three groups performed a pinch-grip skill task with sensory feedback only, sensory and reinforcement feedback, or both feedback coupled with an extrinsic monetary reward during skill training. To probe motor plasticity, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation at rest, on the left primary motor cortex before, at an early-training time point, and after training in the three groups and measured motor-evoked potentials from task-relevant muscle of the right arm. This allowed us to evaluate the amplitude and variability of corticospinal output, GABAergic short-intracortical inhibition, and use-dependent plasticity before training and at two additional time points (early and end training). At the behavioral level, monetary reward accelerated skill learning. In parallel, corticospinal output became less variable early on during training in the presence of extrinsic reward. Interestingly, this effect was particularly pronounced for participants who were more sensitive to reward, as evaluated in an independent questionnaire. Other measures of motor excitability remained comparable across groups. These findings highlight that a mechanism underlying the benefit of reward on motor skill learning is the fine-tuning of early-training resting-state corticospinal variability.

Indexed as

LearningMotor CortexMotor SkillsNeuronal PlasticityRewardAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultcorticospinal excitability (CSE)motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)motor skillsplasticityprimary motor cortex (M1)reinforcementreward

Identifiers

PMID40139803
PMCPMC11984755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.