Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139799›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Knowledge, attitudes and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Uganda, February 2021.

Bob Omoda Amodan, Patricia Thiwe Okumu, John Kamulegeya, Alex Ndyabakira, Geoffrey Amanya, Daniel Jacob Emong, Aggrey Byaruhanga, Job Morukileng, Alex Riolexus Ario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bob Omoda AmodanUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda omobob@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4561-1337
Patricia Thiwe OkumuUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
John KamulegeyaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex NdyabakiraUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Geoffrey AmanyaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel Jacob EmongUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Aggrey ByaruhangaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Job MorukilengUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex Riolexus ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-1952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUganda planned to start its COVID-19 vaccination campaign in March 2021, prioritising healthcare workers, security personnel, elderly and people with comorbidities. However, the willingness to receive the vaccine and potential barriers and hindrances were unknown. To understand the barriers to uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine prior to its rollout, we explored the communities' knowledge, attitudes and barriers.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study in Kampala and Ankole subregions in February 2021. For the household survey, we used three-stage sampling to select three districts in each subregion and, thereafter, 12 villages per district. One adult in each household was interviewed. Additionally, we conducted focus group discussions and key informant interviews to explore knowledge, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. Modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with willingness to receive to COVID-19 vaccine

resultsAmong 1728 respondents, 52% were under 40 years old, and 67% were female. Fifty-nine percent of those who had heard of the vaccine primarly obtained information from radio and television (TV). Despite one-quarter reporting that they had heard that the vaccine could cause death or genetic changes, 85% were willing to receive it. Persons in the Kampala subregion were less willing than those in the Ankole subregion to take the vaccine (76% vs 94%, adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR)=0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.89). Trust in the effectiveness of non-vaccine COVID-19 preventive measures (aPR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.99), living in urban areas (aPR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.91) and lack of information on vaccine safety (aPR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.93) reduced interest in taking the vaccine.

conclusionsVaccine willingness was high despite some misinformation and safety concerns, which more prevalent in Kampala than in the Ankole subregion. While radio and TV were major sources of COVID-19 vaccine information, social media was the biggest propagator of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Therefore, providing credible information about vaccine safety could reinforce uptake, especially among urban residents. Additionally, local and national leaders should publicise their acceptance of vaccines and debunk misinformation.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2UgandaVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19ImmunisationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40139799
PMCPMC11950937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.