Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139697›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Ascertaining social worker contacts in routine mental healthcare and describing their distribution: a descriptive analysis of electronic records data from a large south London mental healthcare provider.

Norah Alothman, Amelia Jewell, Gayan Perera, Robert Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norah AlothmanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK Norah.Alothman@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9404-0705
Amelia JewellNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-2159
Gayan PereraDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3414-303X
Robert StewartDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-6397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the distribution of contacts with mental health service-employed social workers over time and by patient characteristics using routine mental health service data resources.

designA descriptive study. SETTING AND

participantsIn a large secondary mental healthcare provider in London serving a geographic catchment of around 1.3 million residents, mental health social worker contacts were ascertained from the case note entries for all patients aged 16 years or above at the time of contact who received treatment in any services from 2008 to 2023.

main outcome measuresPatient demographic and clinical characteristics at or closest to the social worker contact event.

resultsA total 1 541 078 social worker contacts were extracted. Contacts were most likely in the 20-39 years age group (38.1%), in men (51.9%), in patients from white (45.3%) and black (38.8%) ethnic groups, in those who were non-cohabiting (89.9%) and in those living in more deprived neighbourhoods. The most likely diagnosis in those receiving social work contacts was schizophrenia (39.2%). Males had the highest number of face-to-face social worker contacts, and females were more represented in phone and video contacts. Over the past 16 years, social worker contacts were highest between 2014 and 2015.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the first quantification of social work deployment within mental healthcare. Research into the role of social workers within mental health services has been of small scale and predominantly qualitative to date. However, growing data resources, building on distributions of service provision, present important opportunities for wider evaluation of the role of this professional group and the interventions they support within multidisciplinary teams.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMental DisordersMental Health ServicesSocial WorkersAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultHealth policyHealth WorkforceMENTAL HEALTHSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID40139697
PMCPMC11950943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.