ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2025
Amount and intensity of daily total physical activity, step count and risk of incident cancer in the UK Biobank.
Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk of cancer incidence and mortality in patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Bypassing the systemic cardiorespiratory threshold: neuromuscular electrical stimulation elicits a SPARC response through accelerated glycolytic flux.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
- Exercise therapy in cancer prevention and treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Rural-Urban Differences in Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity Among US Adults: Findings From the REGARDS Study.Journal of physical activity & health · 2026Article
- A Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Literature Algorithms for Physical Activity Endpoints from a Wrist Accelerometer in Free-Living Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Device-measured movement behaviours and cancer incidence in a population sample of UK adults: Dual 24-hour analyses of postural and intensity compositions.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Sedentary behaviour and cancer risk: a World Cancer Research Fund International Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A prospective study of physical activity and cardiometabolic diseases in association with cancer risk.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Continuous assessment of daily-living gait using self-supervised learning of wrist-worn accelerometer data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Designing a Digital Twin for the Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Protocol for a Pilot Study and Methodology Validation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of a clinical workflow designed to identify, refer, and connect insufficiently active patients to health coaching.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- FIGO committee opinion: Environmental drivers of gynecologic and reproductive health.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Associations of accelerometer-measured light-intensity physical activity with mortality and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cancers: A prospective cohort study.Journal of sport and health science · 2025Article
- Physical activity, metabolites, and breast cancer associations.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- No time to wait: daily step counts should be incorporated into physical activity guidelines.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Thyroid Cancer and Physical Activity: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate associations between daily physical activity, activity intensity and step counts with incident cancer risk.
methodsProspective analysis of UK Biobank participants who wore wrist-based accelerometers for 7 days, followed for cancer incidence (mean follow-up 5.8 years, SD 1.3). Time-series machine-learning models derived total physical activity, sedentary behaviour (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), moderate-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) and step counts. The outcome was a composite of 13 cancers previously associated with low physical activity in questionnaire-based studies. Cox proportional hazard models estimated HRs and 95% CIs, adjusted for demographic, health and lifestyle factors. We also explored associations of LIPA, MVPA and SB with cancer risk.
resultsAmong 85 394 participants (median age 63 (IQR 56-68)), 2633 were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. Compared with individuals in the lowest quintile of total physical activity (<21.6 milligravity units), those in the highest (34.3+) had a 26% lower cancer risk (HR=0.74 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.84)). After mutual adjustment, LIPA (HR=0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98)) and MVPA (HR=0.87 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94)) were associated with lower risk, but SB was not. Similar associations were observed for substituting 1 hour/day of SB with LIPA or MVPA. Daily step counts were inversely associated with cancer, with the dose-response beginning to plateau at around 9 000 steps/day (HR=0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96) 7000 vs 5000 steps; HR=0.84 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.93) 9000 vs 5000 steps). There was no significant association between stepping intensity (peak 30-minute cadence) and cancer after adjusting for step count.
conclusionTotal physical activity, LIPA, MVPA and step counts were inversely associated with incident cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.